Kev cai lij choj / ID 24-1141
*** KEV TSO CAI - Hloov Kho Txoj Cai Ua Lag Luam Zoo Dua (Kev daws teeb meem 2009-118) txhawm rau ntxiv qhov kev zam rau Cov Kev Sib Tham Tshwj Xeeb tshwj xeeb cuam tshuam rau cov haujlwm ntiag tug xav txog ntawm Lub Nroog cov cuab yeej uas xav tias yuav muab txiaj ntsig zoo rau pej xeem. (Tshwj xeeb rau Mayor's veto)
Tsis siv neeg txhais lus. Qee cov ntsiab lus tseem tsis tau muaj nyob hauv hom lus no.
- Taw qhia los ntawm
- City Council
- Hnub tim
- Thu, Aug 29, 2024
- Kev tshwm sim
- Thu, Aug 29, 2024
Full textv1
REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
FROM: COUNCILMEMBER MIGUEL ARIAS
District 3
SUBJECT
..Title
***RESOLUTION - Amending the Better Business Act (Resolution 2009-118) to add an exception for Exclusive Negotiating Agreements pertaining to private projects contemplated on City owned property that are anticipated to provide a substantial public benefit. (Subject to Mayor's veto)
..Body
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council adopt a resolution amending the Better Business Act to add an exception for Exclusive Negotiating Agreements pertaining to private projects contemplated on City owned property that are anticipated to provide a substantial public benefit.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The proposed exception would allow the bypass of the lengthy evaluation for Exclusive Negotiating Agreements (ENA) and is specific to instances where the proposed private project is on City owned property and the project is anticipated to provide a substantial public benefit.
BACKGROUND
The Better Business Act (BBA) was established in 2009 as a safety measure to minimize the City's risk when entering into partnerships where a private entity was requesting financial assistance from the City. The BBA requires a due diligence process that requires all potential "partners" to be fully vetted through a comprehensive, objective evaluation. For exclusive negotiating agreements, the BBA requires a preliminary evaluation specifically addressing sub-section 1, 3, and 5 of the BBA evaluation.
The proposed exception would allow the bypass of this lengthy evaluation for Exclusive Negotiating Agreements (ENA) and is specific to instances where the proposed private project is on City owned property and the project is anticipated to provide a substantial public benefit.
ENVIRONMENTAL FINDINGS
By the definition provided in the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines Section 15378 the approval of this resolution does not qualify as a "project" and is therefore exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act requirements.
LOCAL PREFERENCE
Local preference is not applicable as this is not a solicitation for a contract or funds.
FISCAL IMPACT
There is no fiscal impact to the General Fund or any other fund within the City of Fresno.
Attachment:
Resolution
Txhawb nqa
Keeb kwm
| Hnub tim | Lub cev | Kev ua | Kev tshwm sim |
|---|---|---|---|
| Thu, Aug 29, 2024 | City Council | ADOPTED AS AMENDED | Pass |
Cov ntawv txuas
- Resolutionscanned_image