Kev cai lij choj / ID 26-762
Cov kev ua cuam tshuam txog Fresno Code Enforcement case naj npawb E23-01585, hais txog 4816 E. Fillmore Ave., thiab Thawj Tswj Hwm Citation tshaj tawm rau lub Kaum Ob Hlis 17, 2025: 1. KEV TSO CAI RAU HAUV LUB ROOJ HAUJ LWM ntawm Thawj Tswj Hwm Citation. 2. Ua ib qho kev ua hauv qab no: i. TSIS TXAUS SIAB Cov neeg thov tsis tau ua tiav qhov kev txhim kho tseem ceeb ntawm kev kho qhov ua txhaum cai los ntawm Thawj Tswj Hwm Citation tau tshaj tawm Lub Kaum Ob Hlis 17, 2025, thiab ORDER them nyiaj ob npaug ntawm cov nyiaj nplua, nrog rau tag nrho cov nqi tso cai thiab nqi; LOSSIS ii. YUAV TSUM PAUB TIAS Cov neeg thov raug foob tau ua tiav ntau yam los kho cov kev ua txhaum cai tseem ceeb los ntawm Thawj Tswj Hwm Citation tau tshaj tawm lub Kaum Ob Hlis 17, 2025, thiab txuas ntxiv lub rooj sib hais mus rau hnub tom qab; LOSSIS iii. TXOJ CAI Cov neeg thov raug foob tau kho tag nrho cov kev ua txhaum cai los ntawm Thawj Tswj Hwm Citation tshaj tawm lub Kaum Ob Hlis 17, 2025.
Tsis siv neeg txhais lus. Qee cov ntsiab lus tseem tsis tau muaj nyob hauv hom lus no.
- Taw qhia los ntawm
- Building Standards Appeals Board
- Hnub tim
- Tue, Jun 2, 2026
- Kev tshwm sim
- Tue, Jun 2, 2026
Full textv1
REPORT TO THE BUILDING STANDARDS APPEALS BOARD
June 2, 2026
FROM: ANDREW JANZ, City Attorney
Office of the City Attorney
BY: SARAH A. PAPAZIAN, Senior Deputy City Attorney
Office of the City Attorney
SUBJECT
..Title
Actions pertaining to Fresno Code Enforcement case number E23-01585, concerning 4816 E. Fillmore Ave., and the First Administrative Citation issued on December 17, 2025:
1. PROGRESS HEARING on the Appeal of the First Administrative Citation.
2. Take one of the following actions:
i. DETERMINE Appellants HAVE NOT made substantial progress towards correcting the outstanding violations from the First Administrative Citation issued December 17, 2025, and ORDER payment of double the fines, as well as all allowable costs and fees; OR
ii. DETERMINE Appellants HAVE made substantial progress towards correcting the outstanding violations from the First Administrative Citation issued December 17, 2025, and CONTINUE the hearing to a later date; OR
iii. DETERMINE Appellants have FULLY corrected outstanding violations from the First Administrative Citation issued December 17, 2025.
...Body
RECOMMENDATION
Staff will make a recommendation at the Progress Hearing based on the latest available information on correction status of violations.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
On April 7, 2026, the BSAB held a hearing regarding a First Administrative Citation issued December 17, 2025, in case E23-01585 pertaining to 4816 E. Fillmore Ave. (the Property). The BSAB determined that the violations were present at the time the Citation was issued, and remained uncorrected, necessitating a progress hearing to be set.
BACKGROUND
The BSAB was established by Resolution number 2025-149 passed May 22, 2025, in order to hear various appeals, including Code Enforcement appeals related to building standards under FMC Chapter 11, Articles 3 and 4.
To perform this duty, the BSAB must review the Appeal Form received by the appellant, any other information provided by the appellant, the staff report, and all attachments. Pursuant to FMC section 1-408, the scope of the hearing "shall be limited to the order, citation, decision, or determination being appealed, the grounds for relief raised in the notice of appeal, and any specific requirements of this Code." (FMC � 1-408(e).) The BSAB may admit any relevant evidence, "if it is the type of evidence on which responsible persons are accustomed to relay on in the conduct of serious affairs," and "hearsay evidence may be used for the purpose of supplementing or explaining any direct evidence but shall not be sufficient in itself to support a finding unless it would be admissible over objection in civil actions." (FMC � 1-408(d)(3).) The City has the burden of proof and production of evidence, and the burden of proof shall be preponderance of the evidence. (FMC � 1-408(f).) Preponderance of the evidence means the evidence shows a fact is more likely true than not true, or over a 50% probability.
If the BSAB finds that any of the violations set forth in the appealed notice or citation is continuing and remains as of the time of the hearing, the determination must include an order for the Appellant to correct the violations within thirty days, and a progress hearing must be set to occur thirty to sixty days later. (FMC � 1-409(f).)
Progress hearing procedures and requirements are found in FMC section 1-409(f). At the progress hearing, if the BSAB finds all violations are fully corrected, then matter is closed. If the BSAB finds Appellants have made substantial progress but have not been able to complete corrections for reasons beyond their control, the hearing is continued to a later date. If the BSAB finds Appellants have not made substantial progress, they must order payment of double the maximum fines permitted in the FMC, as well as all allowable costs and fees.
ENVIRONMENTAL FINDINGS. Pursuant to California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines Section 15378, the Commission's consideration of the Application is not a CEQA "project".
LOCAL PREFERENCE Not applicable.
FISCAL IMPACT Not applicable.
ATTACHMENTS
Exhibit A - Appeal Packet
Exhibit B - Staff Report
Exhibit C - Findings Matrix
Exhibit D - Presentation
686145v1
Txhawb nqa
- City Attorney's Office
Keeb kwm
| Hnub tim | Lub cev | Kev ua | Kev tshwm sim |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tue, Jun 2, 2026 | Building Standards Appeals Board | APPROVED | Pass |